pivotal actor george

A panel of appellate judges ruled Wednesday that state law limits the practice of blog search engine hiropractic medicine to adjustments of the spinal column, reversing a jury verdict that found in favor of a group of chiropractors sued by an Ocean County woman who received treatment from them on her knee. The ruling by Judges Michael Winkelstein, Jose L. Fuentes and Linda G. Baxter of the appellate division of Superior Court in a case brought by patient Carol Bedford against chiropractors Anthony L. Riello and Peter E. Lowenstein and Coastal Chiropractic quickly evoked dissent from the Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, which said it would support an appeal to the state Supreme Court. The association had filed a friend of the court brief with the appellate division. "The Association of New Jersey Chiropractors strongly disagrees with the Appellate Division's ruling in the Bedford case as it relates to the manipulation of a patient's knee within the normal scope of chiropractic care," according to a statement released Wednesday evening by its attorney, Jeff Randolph. Danielle Chandonnet, an attorney who represented Bedford in the case, said it was her understanding that chiropractors routinely perform adjustments to their patients' extremities. "I believe (the court decision) is going to affect the practice," she said. "Every insurance company pays for extremity adjustments," said Riello.

A panel of appellate judges ruled Wednesday that state law limits the practice of chiropractic medicine to adjustments of the spinal column, reversing a jury verdict that found in favor of a group of chiropractors sued by an Ocean County woman who received treatment from them on her knee. The ruling by Judges Michael Winkelstein, Jose L. Fuentes and Linda G. Baxter of the appellate division of Superior Court in a case brought by patient Carol Bedford against chiropractors Anthony L. Riello deep fat fryers nd Peter E. Lowenstein and Coastal Chiropractic quickly evoked dissent from the Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, which said it would support an appeal to the state Supreme Court. The association had filed a friend of the court brief with the appellate division. "The Association of New Jersey Chiropractors strongly disagrees with the Appellate Division's ruling in the Bedford case as it relates to the manipulation of a patient's knee within the normal scope of chiropractic care," according to a statement released Wednesday evening by its attorney, Jeff Randolph. Danielle Chandonnet, an attorney who represented Bedford in the case, said it was her understanding that chiropractors routinely perform adjustments to their patients' extremities. "I believe (the court decision) is going to affect the practice," she said. "Every insurance company pays for extremity adjustments," said Riello.

Jen-Luc Piquant is feeling very Spiritually Enlightened today, reveling in her newly discovered mystical connection to the billions upon billions of molecules of consciousness scattered about the cosmos. Blame it on an ill-advised viewing late last night of what critics have been calling a "surprise sleeper New Age hit." I'm talking, of course, about What the (Bleep) Do We Know? -- a half documentary, half drama that also spawned a recently released sequel, Down the Rabbit Hole . It's a bit late to be hopping on the Bleep -bashing bandwagon, so I won't waste your time with a lengthy analysis and/or debunking of its more questionable assertions, other than to say we clearly need more public outreach and education on the notion of quantum decoherence (not to be confused with the quantum incoherence in the film), among other concepts, and a better public understanding of the ongoing scientific debate on any possible links between quantum effects and macroscale systems. Others have already weighed in on the issue, who are far more better-informed and eloquent than I, including the Guardian 's Ben Goldacre (Mr. "Bad Science" himself) and Dennis Overbye of The New York Times . Suffice to say, I was less than impressed by the film. Maybe it hacking for dummies as the simplistic story line of a snarky yet self-hating photographer (played by Marlee Matlin) who learns the secret of cosmic happiness by taking a long, luxurious bath while covering herself in hearts.

A panel of appellate judges ruled Wednesday that state law limits the practice of chiropractic medicine to adjustments of the spinal column, reversing a jury verdict that found in favor of a group of chiropractors sued by an Ocean County woman who received treatment from them on her knee. The ruling by Judges Michael Winkelstein, Jose L. Fuentes and Linda G. Baxter of the appellate division of Superior Court in a case brought by patient Carol Bedford against chiropractors Anthony L. Riello and Peter E. Lowenstein and Coastal Chiropractic quickly evoked dissent from the Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, which said it would support an appeal to the state Supreme Court. The association had filed a friend of the court brief with the appellate division. "The Association of New Jersey Chiropractors strongly disagrees with the Appellate Division's ruling in the Bedford case as it relates to the manipulation of a patient's knee within the normal Hooters The cope of chiropractic care," according to a statement released Wednesday evening by its attorney, Jeff Randolph. Danielle Chandonnet, an attorney who represented Bedford in the case, said it was her understanding that chiropractors routinely perform adjustments to their patients' extremities. "I believe (the court decision) is going to affect the practice," she said. "Every insurance company pays for extremity adjustments," said Riello.

fronting paranoia

fronting non profit organization fundraising

pivotal writing for publication