Karl Martino points us to this fascinating 1946 classroom film on "Despotism," which you can download or view online at the Internet Archive . This 10-minute film from Encyclopedia Britannica Films features Dr. Harold D. Lasswell of Yale, who was a professor of law and of political science at the school while both our current and our most recent presidents were students there. The actor george ilm, produced in the immediate aftermath of World War II, presents a spectrum from democracy to despotism. And it begins with this cautionary note: Avoid the comfortable idea that the mere form of government can of itself safeguard a nation against despotism. ... When a competent observer looks for signs of despotism in a community, he looks beyond fine words and noble phrases. That last is shown against a backdrop of patriotic Americans reciting the (original) Pledge of Allegiance, which fades into the silhouette of a lynching. That's the implicit message of this film, It Can Happen Here. We are introduced to a man "who makes it his business to study these things" -- presumably Dr. Lasswell. The professor offers two "yardsticks" for measuring the existence of despotism or democracy in a given community or nation. The Respect Scale ranges from shared to restricted, and measures "how many citizens get an even break." The Power Scale ranges from shared to concentrated. "The test of despotic power is that it can disregard the will of the people," the professor says.

A panel of appellate judges ruled Wednesday that state law limits the practice of chiropractic medicine to adjustments of the spinal column, reversing a jury verdict that found in favor of a group of chiropractors sued by an Ocean County woman who received treatment from them on her knee. The ruling by Judges Michael Winkelstein, Jose L. Fuentes and Linda G. Baxter of the appellate division of Superior Court in a case brought by patient Carol Bedford against chiropractors Anthony L. Riello and Peter E. Lowenstein and Coastal Chiropractic quickly evoked dissent from the Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, which said it would support an appeal to the state Supreme Court. The association had filed a friend of the court brief with the appellate division. "The Association of New Jersey Chiropractors strongly disagrees with the Appellate Division's ruling in the Bedford case as it relates to the manipulation of a patient's knee within the normal scope of chiropractic care," according to a statement released Wednesday evening by its attorney, Jeff Randolph. Danielle Chandonnet, an attorney who represented Bedford blog search engine n the case, said it was her understanding that chiropractors routinely perform adjustments to their patients' extremities. "I believe (the court decision) is going to affect the practice," she said. "Every insurance company pays for extremity adjustments," said Riello.

Jen-Luc Piquant is feeling very Spiritually Enlightened today, reveling in her newly discovered mystical connection to the billions upon billions of molecules of consciousness scattered about the cosmos. Blame it on an ill-advised viewing late last night of what critics have been calling a "surprise sleeper New Age hit." I'm talking, of course, about What the (Bleep) Do We Know? -- a half documentary, half drama that also spawned a recently released sequel, Down the Rabbit Hole . It's a bit late to be hopping on the Bleep -bashing bandwagon, so I won't waste your time with a lengthy analysis and/or debunking of its more questionable assertions, other than to say we clearly need more public outreach and education on the notion of quantum decoherence (not to be confused with the quantum incoherence deep fat fryers n the film), among other concepts, and a better public understanding of the ongoing scientific debate on any possible links between quantum effects and macroscale systems. Others have already weighed in on the issue, who are far more better-informed and eloquent than I, including the Guardian 's Ben Goldacre (Mr. "Bad Science" himself) and Dennis Overbye of The New York Times . Suffice to say, I was less than impressed by the film. Maybe it was the simplistic story line of a snarky yet self-hating photographer (played by Marlee Matlin) who learns the secret of cosmic happiness by taking a long, luxurious bath while covering herself in hearts.

Karl Martino points us to this fascinating 1946 classroom film on "Despotism," which you can download or view online at the Internet Archive . This 10-minute film from hacking for dummies ncyclopedia Britannica Films features Dr. Harold D. Lasswell of Yale, who was a professor of law and of political science at the school while both our current and our most recent presidents were students there. The film, produced in the immediate aftermath of World War II, presents a spectrum from democracy to despotism. And it begins with this cautionary note: Avoid the comfortable idea that the mere form of government can of itself safeguard a nation against despotism. ... When a competent observer looks for signs of despotism in a community, he looks beyond fine words and noble phrases. That last is shown against a backdrop of patriotic Americans reciting the (original) Pledge of Allegiance, which fades into the silhouette of a lynching. That's the implicit message of this film, It Can Happen Here. We are introduced to a man "who makes it his business to study these things" -- presumably Dr. Lasswell. The professor offers two "yardsticks" for measuring the existence of despotism or democracy in a given community or nation. The Respect Scale ranges from shared to restricted, and measures "how many citizens get an even break." The Power Scale ranges from shared to concentrated. "The test of despotic power is that it can disregard the will of the people," the professor says.

Jen-Luc Piquant is feeling very Spiritually Enlightened today, reveling in her newly discovered mystical connection to the billions upon billions of molecules of consciousness scattered about the cosmos. Blame it on an ill-advised viewing late last night of what critics have been calling a "surprise sleeper New Age hit." I'm talking, of course, about What the (Bleep) Do We Know? -- a half documentary, half drama that also spawned a recently released sequel, Down the Rabbit Hole . It's a bit late to be hopping on the Bleep -bashing bandwagon, so I won't waste your time with a lengthy analysis and/or debunking of its more questionable assertions, other than to say we clearly need more public Hooters The utreach and education on the notion of quantum decoherence (not to be confused with the quantum incoherence in the film), among other concepts, and a better public understanding of the ongoing scientific debate on any possible links between quantum effects and macroscale systems. Others have already weighed in on the issue, who are far more better-informed and eloquent than I, including the Guardian 's Ben Goldacre (Mr. "Bad Science" himself) and Dennis Overbye of The New York Times . Suffice to say, I was less than impressed by the film. Maybe it was the simplistic story line of a snarky yet self-hating photographer (played by Marlee Matlin) who learns the secret of cosmic happiness by taking a long, luxurious bath while covering herself in hearts.

Karl Martino points us to this fascinating 1946 classroom film on "Despotism," which you can download or view online at the Internet Archive . This 10-minute film from Encyclopedia Britannica Films features Dr. Harold D. Lasswell of Yale, who was a professor of law and of political science at the school while both our current and our most recent presidents were students there. The film, produced in the immediate aftermath of World War II, presents a spectrum from democracy to despotism. And it begins with this cautionary note: Avoid the comfortable idea that the mere form of government can of itself safeguard a nation paranoia gainst despotism. ... When a competent observer looks for signs of despotism in a community, he looks beyond fine words and noble phrases. That last is shown against a backdrop of patriotic Americans reciting the (original) Pledge of Allegiance, which fades into the silhouette of a lynching. That's the implicit message of this film, It Can Happen Here. We are introduced to a man "who makes it his business to study these things" -- presumably Dr. Lasswell. The professor offers two "yardsticks" for measuring the existence of despotism or democracy in a given community or nation. The Respect Scale ranges from shared to restricted, and measures "how many citizens get an even break." The Power Scale ranges from shared to concentrated. "The test of despotic power is that it can disregard the will of the people," the professor says.

Karl Martino points us to this fascinating 1946 classroom film on "Despotism," which you can download or view online at the Internet Archive . This 10-minute film from Encyclopedia Britannica Films features Dr. Harold D. Lasswell of Yale, who was a professor of law and of political science at the school while both our current and our most recent presidents were students there. The film, produced in the immediate aftermath of World War II, presents a spectrum from democracy to despotism. And it begins with this cautionary note: Avoid the comfortable idea that the mere form of government can of itself safeguard a nation against despotism. ... When a competent observer looks for signs of despotism in a community, he looks beyond fine words and noble phrases. That last is shown against a backdrop of patriotic Americans reciting the (original) Pledge of Allegiance, which fades into the silhouette of a lynching. That's the implicit message of this film, It Can Happen Here. We are introduced to a man "who makes it his business to study these things" -- presumably non profit fundraising r. Lasswell. The professor offers two "yardsticks" for measuring the existence of despotism or democracy in a given community or nation. The Respect Scale ranges from shared to restricted, and measures "how many citizens get an even break." The Power Scale ranges from shared to concentrated. "The test of despotic power is that it can disregard the will of the people," the professor says.

A panel of appellate judges ruled Wednesday that state law limits the practice of chiropractic medicine to adjustments of the spinal column, reversing a jury verdict that found in favor of a group of chiropractors sued by an Ocean County woman who received treatment from them on her knee. The ruling by Judges Michael Winkelstein, Jose L. Fuentes and Linda G. Baxter of the appellate division of Superior Court in a case brought by patient Carol Bedford against chiropractors Anthony L. Riello and Peter E. Lowenstein and Coastal Chiropractic quickly evoked dissent from the Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, which said it would support an appeal to the state Supreme Court. The association had filed a friend of the court brief with the appellate division. "The Association of New Jersey Chiropractors strongly disagrees with the Appellate Division's ruling in the Bedford case as it relates to the manipulation of a patient's knee within the writing for publication ormal scope of chiropractic care," according to a statement released Wednesday evening by its attorney, Jeff Randolph. Danielle Chandonnet, an attorney who represented Bedford in the case, said it was her understanding that chiropractors routinely perform adjustments to their patients' extremities. "I believe (the court decision) is going to affect the practice," she said. "Every insurance company pays for extremity adjustments," said Riello.